Law and Surplus: Opportunities Missed

56 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2018 Last revised: 24 Oct 2019

Date Written: November 9, 2018

Abstract

Surplus is a ubiquitous feature of economic activity. The ubiquity of surplus challenges us to find fair and efficient ways to share resources. This is the surplus problem. This Article documents the miscues and mistaken assumptions that have left research on how legal rules can address the surplus problem woefully underexplored. Three missed opportunities are particularly noteworthy. First, scholars studying “rent-seeking” mistakenly limit their investigation of links between surplus and wasteful competition to situations involving grants of government privilege. Second, law and economics scholars incorrectly assume that a laissez-faire approach is presumptively the best way to address the surplus problem. Finally, consumer law scholars fail to recognize how central solving the surplus problem is to providing a sound economic justification for consumer protection law. Collectively, these case studies illustrate how law’s role in addressing the surplus problem has been shunted to the periphery of legal scholarship rather than placed at the center of legal discourse where it rightly belongs.

Keywords: economic justice, surplus, microeconomics, rent

JEL Classification: D00, D30, D63, K00

Suggested Citation

Guttentag, Michael D., Law and Surplus: Opportunities Missed (November 9, 2018). 2019 Utah Law Review 607 (2019), Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-41, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3281796

Michael D. Guttentag (Contact Author)

Loyola Marymount University ( email )

7900 Loyola Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90045
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
1,040
rank
317,844
PlumX Metrics