Legally Tidy, Practically Less? The Supreme Court's Decision in the 'Vitamin C Case'

"Legally Tidy, Practically Less? The Supreme Court's Decision in the 'Vitamin C Case'", "Hot Topics" in International Antitrust Law (ABA Section of International Law International Antitrust Law Committee Nov. 2018)

3 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2018

See all articles by Yee Wah Chin

Yee Wah Chin

Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti, LLP

Date Written: October 22, 2018

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 585 U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 1865 (2018), settled the standard by which foreign governments can control how their internal laws are determined by U.S. courts. The decision is arguably simply a reading of the plain language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1. It may be a roadmap to what is needed to support a statement of foreign law. On balance, the decision in Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical is a helpful clarification of an important point of civil procedure that is not a significant departure from precedent.

Keywords: Rule 44.1, determination of foreign law

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K33 K40, K41, K49

Suggested Citation

Chin, Yee Wah, Legally Tidy, Practically Less? The Supreme Court's Decision in the 'Vitamin C Case' (October 22, 2018). "Legally Tidy, Practically Less? The Supreme Court's Decision in the 'Vitamin C Case'", "Hot Topics" in International Antitrust Law (ABA Section of International Law International Antitrust Law Committee Nov. 2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3282425

Yee Wah Chin (Contact Author)

Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti, LLP ( email )

250 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10177
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.ywc-antitrust.com

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
120
PlumX Metrics