What Jurors Should Know about Informants: The Need for Expert Testimony

43 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2018 Last revised: 7 Dec 2018

Date Written: November 21, 2018


With the advent of DNA exonerations, the data would indicate that many individuals have been wrongly convicted. In looking at the causes of the exonerations, nearly 20% have involved testimony by accomplices and jailhouse informants. The questionable credibility of these individuals has long been recognized by courts and legislatures. Reforms in this area include, enhanced jury instructions, pre-trial credibility hearings, and corroboration before the testimony can be introduced.

This article argues the efficacy of expert testimony to further assist jurors in measuring the credibility of these witnesses. Although the use of experts has largely been disfavored by courts, there has been a gradual movement to use experts for eyewitness identifications, the major cause of exonerations. The article proposes a similar movement for informant testimony.

Suggested Citation

Bloom, Robert M., What Jurors Should Know about Informants: The Need for Expert Testimony (November 21, 2018). Michigan State Law Review, Forthcoming, Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 494, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3288636

Robert M. Bloom (Contact Author)

Boston College Law School ( email )

885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics