'Declarations of Inconsistency' Under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
Geddis, A. (2017, June). "Declarations of inconsistency" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. UK Constitutional Law blog.
7 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2019
Date Written: 2017
Abstract
This article considers the constitutional question of whether prisoners should be permitted to vote. The author discusses the case of Attorney General v Taylor and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, to conclude that the final say on this issue remains with the New Zealand Government.
Keywords: Constitutional law, election law, public law, Attorney General v Taylor, New Zealand
JEL Classification: K00, K30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Geddis, Andrew, 'Declarations of Inconsistency' Under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (2017). Geddis, A. (2017, June). "Declarations of inconsistency" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. UK Constitutional Law blog., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3288901
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.