What Makes a Decision Strategic? Strategic Representations

Strategy Science, Forthcoming

37 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2018

See all articles by Felipe A. Csaszar

Felipe A. Csaszar

University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business

Date Written: November 5, 2018

Abstract

This paper delves into the effects that strategic representations have on firm performance. It does so in four ways. First, it describes different types of representations—internal, external, and distributed—and it points to their pervasiveness in strategy. Second, it presents a framework to study the effects of these representations on firm performance and shows how several strategy theories can be mapped into this framework. Third, it provides three detailed illustrations of how this framework can be used to address important questions in strategy; namely, what are the antecedents of strategic foresight, how the simplicity or complexity of representations affects firm performance, and how to incorporate the role of managerial cognition into the resource-based view. Fourth, it proposes a research agenda to further the study of the representation–performance link. Overall, this paper proposes that studying strategic representations is paramount since the success of strategies—and the realism of the strategy field—hinges on understanding how representations affect performance. Strategic representations, thus, are a central element of “what makes a decision strategic.”

Keywords: representation, managerial cognition, Carnegie tradition, aggregation

JEL Classification: D21, D23, D81, D83, M13, O31, O32

Suggested Citation

Csaszar, Felipe A., What Makes a Decision Strategic? Strategic Representations (November 5, 2018). Strategy Science, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3289719

Felipe A. Csaszar (Contact Author)

University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )

701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI MI 48109
United States
(734) 615 4854 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
472
rank
294,094
PlumX Metrics