Permissive Certificates: Collectors of Art as Collectors of Permissions

58 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2018 Last revised: 14 Nov 2019

Date Written: October 1, 2019

Abstract

Artists have been dramatically reshaping the fine art certificate of authenticity since the 1960s. Where traditional certificates merely certified extant objects as authentic works of a named artist, newer instruments purported both to authorize the creation of unbuilt artworks and instruct buyers how to manifest and install them. Such “Permissive Certificates” have fascinated contemporary art historians ever since. Prior scholarship has shown how such documents, essentially blueprints for art creation, force us to confront fundamental ontological questions on the nature of art, the relationship between artist, collector and viewer, and the influence of money and acquisitiveness on art generation. But rarely, if ever, have they been approached as legal instruments.

This Article accordingly fills that gap by construing Permissive Certificates through the complex but potent array of legal rights that they define. It argues that Permissive Certificates are not unitary instruments, but in fact an amalgamation of two distinct legal structures. They couple narrow retrospective warranties on the one hand with prospective copyright licenses and rights of source association on the other. Critically, as with all copyright and source-based permissions, they are conditioned on the owner/licensee complying with use guidelines. Material variations from such terms place the owner/licensee outside the scope of the license, or otherwise in breach, and at risk of claims of infringement by the artist.

This approach to Permissive Certificates yields two important insights. First, they harbor an unappreciated power as a tool for artist control, particularly in jurisdictions such as the U.S. where moral rights remain relatively weak. Second, and more broadly, as art becomes increasingly more dematerialized, digitized, and duplicable, and ever more legalized in turn, Permissive Certificates will grow more and more into the locus of value for such works. Over the long run, museums and other collectors of fine art will become collectors, not of objects, but of permissions. The aura of the artist’s hand will be that of a signature and not of a brushstroke.

Keywords: certificates, authenticity, conceptual art, Donald Judd, Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Giuseppe Panza, copyright license, termination, warranty

JEL Classification: K11

Suggested Citation

Karol, Peter, Permissive Certificates: Collectors of Art as Collectors of Permissions (October 1, 2019). 94(no. 3) Washington Law Review 1175 (October, 2019), New England Law | Boston Research Paper No. 19-02, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3295181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3295181

Peter Karol (Contact Author)

New England Law | Boston ( email )

154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
665
rank
357,599
PlumX Metrics