A Jehovah’s Witness’s Autonomy versus the Interests of Her Children – ES v AC Mnyonfd

Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 81, p. 316-325, 2018

10 Pages Posted: 13 Dec 2018

See all articles by F Mnyongani

F Mnyongani

University of South Africa - School of Law

Magda Slabbert

University of South Africa - School of Law

Date Written: May 4, 2018

Abstract

In this case, the right to self-determination on religious grounds – or the autonomy of the mother of three minor children – was afforded more weight by the majority of the judges than were the best interests of the children. We argue that this approach, in the specific circumstances of the family being of African origin, was wrong and that the view adopted by Mainga J, namely, that cases of competing human rights should be considered on a case-by-case basis, seems to be more acceptable. In conclusion we argue that a curator ad litem should have been appointed to guard the interests of the children.

Keywords: blood transfusion, Jehovah’s Witness, right to self-determination, interests of children

Suggested Citation

Mnyongani, F and Slabbert, Magda, A Jehovah’s Witness’s Autonomy versus the Interests of Her Children – ES v AC Mnyonfd (May 4, 2018). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 81, p. 316-325, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3295601

F Mnyongani (Contact Author)

University of South Africa - School of Law ( email )

South Africa

Magda Slabbert

University of South Africa - School of Law ( email )

Zimbabwe

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
193
PlumX Metrics