The Denial of Restitution Under Italian Law: A Perspective on Patel v. Mirza

European Review of Private Law [ERPL], Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 255-263, 2018

Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 19/1

11 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2019

Abstract

An important difference between the Italian system and the German and English systems concerns the scope of application: Article 2035 Italian Civil Code is limited to immoral contracts, i.e. contracts that are against good morals. Thus, if the parties acted unlawfully (but not immorally), the contract is void and ordinary restitutions apply. The rationale behind the limited scope of application is that people are required to know what is against morality and can adapt their behaviour to it.

At the beginning, I will try to indicate how an Italian Court would probably have ruled in a case like Patel v. Mirza. Some brief remarks on problematic issues and on the future perspectives of the in pari turpitudine rule of the Italian Civil Code will follow.

Note: This article is published in the Max Planck Private Law Research Paper Series with the permission of the rights owner, Kluwer Law International.

Keywords: Contract Law, Invalidity, Good morals, Restitution

Suggested Citation

Patti, Francesco Paolo, The Denial of Restitution Under Italian Law: A Perspective on Patel v. Mirza. European Review of Private Law [ERPL], Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 255-263, 2018; Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 19/1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300085

Francesco Paolo Patti (Contact Author)

Bocconi University - Department of Law ( email )

Via Roentgen, 1
Milan, 20136
Italy

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
131
Abstract Views
404
rank
215,268
PlumX Metrics