Populism, International Law, and the End of Keep Calm and Carry on Lawyering

Forthcoming in the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law

25 Pages Posted: 31 Dec 2018

Date Written: December 13, 2018

Abstract

The relationship between populism and international law is mostly conveyed as one of populist-problem versus international law-solution. International lawyers feel called upon to respond to the rise in populism with multilateralism and liberal internationalism in a ‘keep calm and carry on lawyering’ fashion. However, this attitude of us (the internationalists) versus them (the populists) tends to present a geographically Western-centric and epistemologically euro-centric view of populism and international law. Two crucial aspects about populism and international law are overlooked in this narrow understanding: First, the role that international lawyers and institutions have played in institutionalising and upholding neoliberalism and therefore in creating a specific type of nationalist populist backlash; and second, the progressive forms of populism which may be compatible with a radical internationalism of solidarity.

Suggested Citation

Schwöbel-Patel, Christine, Populism, International Law, and the End of Keep Calm and Carry on Lawyering (December 13, 2018). Forthcoming in the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300695

Christine Schwöbel-Patel (Contact Author)

University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )

Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people?id=25504b090aaed74b111e4d096c3cf151%20

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
rank
197,620
Abstract Views
590
PlumX Metrics