Was Entick v Carrington a Landmark?

Published in Adam Tomkins and Paul Scott, eds, Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law (Hart Publishing 2015) pp 109-130

26 Pages Posted: 3 Jan 2019

Date Written: December 19, 2018

Abstract

Entick v Carrington (1765) 2 Wils KB 275 was a landmark not only in the development of the law of the constitution, but also in the development of a distinctively English mixture of judicial restraint and judicial creativity. Lord Camden’s decision was a model of the common law method of devising new ways of controlling public powers, while disclaiming any power to legislate and, in fact, claiming to abide by the ‘ancient venerable edifice’ of the constitution. The result was a practical reform that protected civil liberties, on the basis of a very conservative understanding of the constitution, according to which public authorities are limited by law, but have powers that are not specified by law. I defend that understanding against the twenty-first-century idea that public authorities may do nothing except what the law expressly or impliedly authorises.

Keywords: Entick v Carrington, constitutional law, common law, public power

Suggested Citation

Endicott, Timothy A.O., Was Entick v Carrington a Landmark? (December 19, 2018). Published in Adam Tomkins and Paul Scott, eds, Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law (Hart Publishing 2015) pp 109-130. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3304132

Timothy A.O. Endicott (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
343
rank
294,397
PlumX Metrics