Livelihood Diversification and Vulnerability to Poverty in Rural Malawi

37 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2019

See all articles by Solomon Asfaw

Solomon Asfaw

United Nations - Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)

Nancy McCarthy

LEAD Analytics

Adriana Paolantonio

Independent

Romina Cavatassi

IFAD

Mulubrhan Amare Reda

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Leslie Lipper

Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN

Date Written: August 1, 2015

Abstract

Climate variability, associated with farm-income variability, is recognized as one of the main drivers of livelihood diversification strategies in developing countries. Analysing determinants of livelihood diversification choices, to better understand household strategic behaviour in the event of climatic risks and other shocks, is important for the formulation of development policies in developing countries highly dependent on rain-fed agriculture, like Malawi. We use geo-referenced farm-household-level data collected in 2010-11 to investigate how climatic variability influences the pattern of diversification that farmers adopt, and the impacts of these choices on welfare. To do so we apply the “vulnerability to expected poverty” approach which measures the future level of poverty taking into consideration the role of risk and uncertainty. The analysis considers the effect of policies and institutions such as fertilizer subsidies, extension services, safety-net and credit on diversification choices. The results show that higher levels of climate risk generally increase the likelihood of diversification across labour, cropland and income, suggesting the importance of diversification as a response to constraints imposed by increased risk. In contrast, we find that in areas with favourable average rainfall conditions households are more likely to diversify income, suggesting diversification as a response to opportunities. In terms of welfare, the analysis performed on the components of vulnerability to poverty provides evidence that climatic variables are key determinants of both components of vulnerability (expected consumption and its variance). Fertilizer subsidies are found to be significant in diversification choices for all dimensions and also particularly effective in reducing vulnerability to poverty in high variability environments although the same does not hold for extension. Looking at differences across gender, we find that women labour diversification is less responsive than men’s, resulting in a lower positive impact on expected consumption per capita.

Suggested Citation

Asfaw, Solomon and McCarthy, Nancy and Paolantonio, Adriana and Cavatassi, Romina and Reda, Mulubrhan Amare and Lipper, Leslie, Livelihood Diversification and Vulnerability to Poverty in Rural Malawi (August 1, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3305894 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3305894

Solomon Asfaw

United Nations - Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) ( email )

Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
Rome, Lazio 00100
ITALY

Nancy McCarthy

LEAD Analytics ( email )

Washington, DC
United States

Adriana Paolantonio (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Romina Cavatassi

IFAD ( email )

Via Paolo di Dono
Rome, 00142
Italy

Mulubrhan Amare Reda

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Leslie Lipper

Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN ( email )

Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
Rome, Lazio 00100
Italy

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
93
PlumX Metrics