Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of the 2016 Brexit Referendum

DCU Brexit Institute - Working Paper N.12 - 2018

21 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2019

See all articles by Sandra Kröger

Sandra Kröger

University of Exeter - Department of Politics

Date Written: December 28, 2018

Abstract

This contribution addresses the input legitimacy of the British EU membership referendum of June 2016. It considers who was given a vote in the first place, and whether those given a vote could make a reasonable choice in light of the campaign. More precisely, it assesses the following four criteria: the franchise, the presence of clarity, the amount and quality of information, and the quality of public debate, arguing that instances of direct democracy, such as referendums, require higher standards of civic behaviour from both elected representatives and voters than those required of representative democracy. The empirical analysis of these criteria shows that the referendum fell short regarding the first two criteria whilst it could have done better as regards the last two. The paper concludes by briefly discussing what can be learnt from this referendum for future referendums.

Keywords: Brexit, democratic legitimacy, European Union, input legitimacy, referendum

Suggested Citation

Kröger, Sandra, Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of the 2016 Brexit Referendum (December 28, 2018). DCU Brexit Institute - Working Paper N.12 - 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3312457 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312457

Sandra Kröger (Contact Author)

University of Exeter - Department of Politics ( email )

Amory Building
Rennes Drive
Exeter, Devon EX4 4RJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
rank
264,993
Abstract Views
782
PlumX Metrics