Lessons in Reading Law: Rimini Street's Duel over 'Full Costs'

20 Federalist Society Review 18 (2019)

8 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2019

Date Written: January 9, 2019

Abstract

As Rimini Street illustrates well, plain meaning can be a trap for the unwary. Dictionaries alone cannot always decide questions of statutory interpretation, even under the plain meaning rule. Construing text requires reading it in its full context, taking into consideration any relevant historical or jurisprudential glosses to the text. In this case, both sides invoke fundamental principles of statutory interpretation. But, reading law here in holistic fashion, Rimini Street makes better sense of Section 505’s “full costs” when viewed in its full context.

Keywords: statutory interpretation, textualism, Copyright Act

Suggested Citation

Nolette, Joel, Lessons in Reading Law: Rimini Street's Duel over 'Full Costs' (January 9, 2019). 20 Federalist Society Review 18 (2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3312459

Joel Nolette (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
8
Abstract Views
35
PlumX Metrics