Racial Indirection

52 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2019 Last revised: 7 Mar 2019

Date Written: January 9, 2019


Racial indirection describes practices that produce racially disproportionate results without the overt use of race. This Article demonstrates how racial indirection has allowed — and may continue to allow — efforts to desegregate America’s universities. By analyzing the Supreme Court’s affirmative action cases, the Article shows how specific features of affirmative action doctrine have required and incentivized racial indirection, and how these same features have helped sustain the constitutionality of affirmative action to this point. The Article then discusses the potential benefits and costs of adopting indirection in affirmative action, and describes disagreements among Justices about the value of indirection that do not track along the usual ideological lines. Finally, in light of the rightward shift on the Court and the litigation over Harvard’s admissions program, the Article expects affirmative action not to disappear but to be driven underground — with ever-less conspicuous considerations of race.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Affirmative Action, Higher Education, Equality, Diversity, Inclusion, Colorblindness, Post-Racialism, Fairness, Social Cohesion, Political Viability, Racial Transition, Racial Justice, Government Transparency, Principled Reasoning, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard

Suggested Citation

Joshi, Yuvraj, Racial Indirection (January 9, 2019). UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3312518

Yuvraj Joshi (Contact Author)

Yale University, Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics