Incorporation by Reference: Requiem for a Useless Tradition

56 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2019 Last revised: 19 Jun 2019

See all articles by Antonio Gidi

Antonio Gidi

Syracuse University - College of Law

Date Written: February 1, 2019

Abstract

American lawyers mechanically introduce each count in a pleading with the talismanic clause of “repeat and reallege” everything said before. It is a useless recitation cluttering complaints, answers, and indictments; it has no purpose, makes no sense, and is not used in any other legal system. This medieval practice made sense in the formalistic common-law pleading of the sixteenth century but has no place in modern pleadings.

This article traces the practice to a 1591 Queen’s Bench opinion, and follows its evolution from English common law to American common-law pleading to American code pleading to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It explains how this useless tradition survived logic and common sense, and why it should have been abolished centuries ago. It concludes that it is an empty tradition with no basis in the law.

Note: Comments are welcome until January 31st, 2018.

Keywords: incorporation by reference, common law pleading, code pleading, pleading, repeat and reallege

Suggested Citation

Gidi, Antonio, Incorporation by Reference: Requiem for a Useless Tradition (February 1, 2019). 70 Hastings L. J. 989 (2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3313813

Antonio Gidi (Contact Author)

Syracuse University - College of Law ( email )

Syracuse, NY 13244-1030
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.gidi.com.br

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
Abstract Views
615
rank
209,029
PlumX Metrics