Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement Revisited

21 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2019

See all articles by Douglas J. Cumming

Douglas J. Cumming

Florida Atlantic University

Sofia Johan

Florida Atlantic University - Finance; Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 20, 2018

Abstract

While it is not clear from Christensen, Hail, and Leuz (2016), the market abuse rules they examine are the same as in Cumming, Johan, and Li (2011), with a difference in focus on the date: Christensen et al. (2016) pick the date the regulations were signed into law, while Cumming et al. (2011) pick date the date the regulations were implemented with organizational agreements and computerized surveillance. Both papers study and find the exact same effect: regulatory change improves market liquidity. We explain the relative merits of the different approaches in this paper, and identify misleading statements in prior work.

Keywords: Securities Regulation, Market Manipulation, Liquidity, Insider Trading, Broker-Agency Conflict, Law and Finance

JEL Classification: G12, G14, G18, K22

Suggested Citation

Cumming, Douglas J. and Johan, Sofia A., Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement Revisited (October 20, 2018). Finance Research Letters, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3317546

Douglas J. Cumming (Contact Author)

Florida Atlantic University ( email )

777 Glades Rd
Boca Raton, FL 33431
United States

HOME PAGE: http://booksite.elsevier.com/9780124095373/

Sofia A. Johan

Florida Atlantic University - Finance ( email )

777 Glades Rd
Boca Raton, FL 33431
United States

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
248
Abstract Views
1,071
rank
11,135
PlumX Metrics