69 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2019 Last revised: 10 Feb 2019
Date Written: February 4, 2019
The last few years have brought a renewed appreciation of the costs of nondisclosure agreements that suppress information about sexual wrongdoing. Recently passed bills in a number of states, including New York and California, have attempted to deal with such hush contracts. But such legislation is often incomplete, and many courts and commentators continue to ask if victims of harassment can sign enforceable settlements that conceal serious, potentially metastasizing, social harms. In this Article, we argue that employing the public policy doctrine, courts ought to generally refuse to enforce hush agreements, especially those created by organizations. We restate public policy as a defense which should to be concerned with managing externalities, and which expresses a legitimating account of contract law.
Keywords: #metoo, sexual harassment, contracts, public policies, externalities
JEL Classification: K12, K31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation