A Comparative Approach to Administrative Adjudication

A Comparative Approach to Administrative Adjudication, Chapter 35, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming

(2015) 63 AJCL 3

38 Pages Posted: 20 Feb 2019

See all articles by Michael Asimow

Michael Asimow

SANTA CLARA LAW SCHOOL ; Santa Clara University - School of Law

Date Written: February 4, 2019

Abstract

Administrative schemes of regulation and benefit-distribution give rise to large numbers of individualized disputes between government agencies and private parties. Every country needs a system of administrative adjudication to resolve such disputes accurately, fairly, and efficiently. Generally, all such systems provide for a front line determination, an initial decision, administrative reconsideration, and judicial review. However, the details of the various systems are bewilderingly diverse. This chapter proposes a methodology for classifying such systems. It identifies four key variables: combined function agencies or separate tribunals, adversarial or inquisitorial procedure, closed or open judicial review, and judicial review by generalized or specialized courts. The chapter identifies five models in common use around the world that involve different combinations of these variables. Finally, the chapter discusses the utility of transplants from the adjudicatory system of one country to another.

Suggested Citation

Asimow, Michael R., A Comparative Approach to Administrative Adjudication (February 4, 2019). A Comparative Approach to Administrative Adjudication, Chapter 35, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming , (2015) 63 AJCL 3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3328972 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3328972

Michael R. Asimow (Contact Author)

SANTA CLARA LAW SCHOOL ( email )

1275 Trinity Drive
Menlo Park, CA California 94025
United States
650-575-4858 (Phone)
94025 (Fax)

Santa Clara University - School of Law ( email )

500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Abstract Views
701
rank
236,795
PlumX Metrics