The Limits to Benefit Tourism: The Case of Elisabeta Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig

(2014) 3 Cyprus Human Rights Law Review 217

Posted: 28 Sep 2019

See all articles by Adrienne Yong

Adrienne Yong

The City Law School of City University London

Date Written: July 1, 2015

Abstract

On 11 November 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union ('CJEU') issued a judgment attracting considerable media attention, as it touched upon the core of austerity measures, the financial crisis, and, more generally, the causes for scepticism towards the European Union ('EU') especially as to the rights of free moving citizens within the EU.1 The Dano judgment highlights the limits to benefit tourism, and strikes an unusually stringent tone. The limits to benefit tourism will be the focus of this article.

Keywords: benefit tourism, Dano, welfare, EU law, citizenship

Suggested Citation

Yong, Adrienne, The Limits to Benefit Tourism: The Case of Elisabeta Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig (July 1, 2015). (2014) 3 Cyprus Human Rights Law Review 217, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3329364

Adrienne Yong (Contact Author)

The City Law School of City University London ( email )

London, EC1V OHB
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
247
PlumX Metrics