Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'

26 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2003  

Claire A. Hill

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law

Abstract

Business contracts have been reviled since before the Marx Brothers' infamous 'there ain't no Sanity Clause' sketch as being replete with duplicative, cumbersome, inartful, and sometimes imprecise language. My article seeks to understand why practice apparently hasn't made perfect - why business contracts are not as clear, and only as long, as would seem to be optimal. I argue that the contract production process combines rational, and what some would consider irrational, elements to create a serviceable, but arguably second-best, product. I discuss dynamics of law firms and their clients that contribute to the continuing viability of an 'imperfect product.'

JEL Classification: L2, K22, L14

Suggested Citation

Hill, Claire A., Why Contracts are Written in 'Legalese'. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=332941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332941

Claire Ariane Hill (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-6521 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
444
Rank
50,206
Abstract Views
3,421