Epistemological and Ontological Priors: Varieties of Explicitness and Research Integrity

American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report I.1-1 (August 2018)

18 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2019

See all articles by Marcus Kreuzer

Marcus Kreuzer

Villanova University - Department of Political Science

Craig Parsons

University of Oregon

Date Written: February 12, 2019

Abstract

The original DA-RT transparency agenda aspired to be "epistemically neutral," hoping that open and explicit practices would promote "cross-border understanding" among research traditions, as Lupia and Elman wrote in their 2014 symposium in PS. This claim to neutrality provoked challenges during the Qualitative Transparency Deliberations. Some objected to DA-RT's notion of transparency as narrow and called for broader conceptions of openness or explicitness. Others rejected the very goal of DA-RT, questioning the value of seeking newly explicit standards. This line ran through our Working Group on Ontological and Epistemological Priors, to the point that we opted to write two reports. Our contribution, which is more optimistic about an inclusive version of DA-RT, should therefore be read alongside the one by Timothy Luke, Antonio Vásquez-Arroyo and Mary Hawkesworth. Our full report inventories the views of transparency or explicitness highlighted in the QTD discussions. It notes that scholars' views of transparency reflect different understandings of ethics, the history of science, sociology of knowledge, and cognitive psychology that inform the overall integrity of the research process.

Keywords: qualitative methods, research transparency, epistemology, ontology, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations

Suggested Citation

Kreuzer, Marcus and Parsons, Craig, Epistemological and Ontological Priors: Varieties of Explicitness and Research Integrity (February 12, 2019). American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report I.1-1 (August 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332846 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332846

Marcus Kreuzer (Contact Author)

Villanova University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Villanova, PA 19085
United States
610-519-5300 (Phone)

Craig Parsons

University of Oregon ( email )

1280 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
rank
355,863
Abstract Views
183
PlumX Metrics