Epistemological and Ontological Priors: Explicating the Perils of Transparency

American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report 1.1-2 (December 2018)

25 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2019

See all articles by Timothy W. Luke

Timothy W. Luke

Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

Antonio Vázquez-Arroyo

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Mary Hawkesworth

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick/Piscataway

Date Written: February 12, 2019

Abstract

The discipline of political science encompasses multiple research communities, which have grown out of and rely upon different epistemological and ontological presuppositions. Recent debates about transparency raise important questions about which of these research communities will be accredited within the discipline, whose values, norms, and methods of knowledge production will gain ascendency and whose will be marginalized. Although the language of "transparency" makes it appear that these debates are apolitical, simply elaborating standards that all political scientists share, the intensity and content of recent contestations about DA-RT, JETS, and QTD attest to the profoundly political nature of these methodological discussions. This report traces the epistemological and ontological assumptions that have shaped diverse research communities within the discipline, situating "transparency" in relation to classical (Aristotelian), modern (Baconian) and twentieth-century (positivist, critical rationalist, and postpositivist) versions of empiricism. It shows how recent discussions of transparency accredit certain empirical approaches by collapsing the scope of empirical investigation and the parameters of the knowable. And it argues that "transparency" is inappropriate as a regulative ideal for political science because it misconstrues the roles of theory, social values, and critique in scholarly investigation.

Keywords: qualitative methods, research transparency, epistemology, ontology, philosophy of science, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations

Suggested Citation

Luke, Timothy W. and Vázquez-Arroyo, Antonio and Hawkesworth, Mary, Epistemological and Ontological Priors: Explicating the Perils of Transparency (February 12, 2019). American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report 1.1-2 (December 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332878 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332878

Timothy W. Luke (Contact Author)

Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University ( email )

Antonio Vázquez-Arroyo

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Mary Hawkesworth

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick/Piscataway

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
47
Abstract Views
145
PlumX Metrics