Comment, Regulation and Investors' Trust in the Securities Markets

13 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2002

See all articles by Tamar Frankel

Tamar Frankel

Boston University School of Law

Date Written: September 23, 2002


This comment focuses on the relationship between investors' trust and government market regulation. The costs of regulation may be a barrier to issuers; however, when market prices rise, government regulation relaxes, and when prices fall, regulation becomes stricter. Regulated financial institutions benefit from regulation, by offering issuers and investors government support in their efforts to gain investors' trust and for other reasons. Regulation may be less meaningful to investors during rising markets and more meaningful after a crash because investors use prices as a surrogate for market integrity. Investors do not have appeared to have fled the markets in the last thirty years as they did in the 1930s, possibly because some have been locked into investments for tax benefits, and some have fled the equity markets for banks. Thus, investors do not react to falling prices as they did in the past. If investors' trust wanes, a change to a corporate culture of honesty may restore it.

Keywords: investor trust, markets, securities regulation

JEL Classification: K22, K2

Suggested Citation

Frankel, Tamar, Comment, Regulation and Investors' Trust in the Securities Markets (September 23, 2002). Available at SSRN: or

Tamar Frankel (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-3773 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics