Summary: Process Tracing and Comparative Methods

American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report III.1S (January 2019)

3 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2019

See all articles by Andrew Bennett

Andrew Bennett

Georgetown University - Department of Government

Tasha Fairfield

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)

Hillel David Soifer

Temple University Political Science Department

Date Written: February 12, 2019

Abstract

This is the summary of Qualitative Transparency Deliberations Final Report on Process Tracing and Comparative Methods, Working Group number III.1.

Keywords: qualitative methods, research transparency, process tracing, case studies, comparative methods, Bayesianism, causal mechanisms, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations

Suggested Citation

Bennett, Andrew and Fairfield, Tasha and Soifer, Hillel David, Summary: Process Tracing and Comparative Methods (February 12, 2019). American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Qualitative Transparency Deliberations, Working Group Final Reports, Report III.1S (January 2019) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333406 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333406

Andrew Bennett (Contact Author)

Georgetown University - Department of Government ( email )

ICC, Suite 681
Washington, DC 20057-1034
United States

Tasha Fairfield

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Hillel David Soifer

Temple University Political Science Department ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
335
rank
292,068
PlumX Metrics