Rethinking Police Rulemaking

60 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2019

See all articles by Maria Ponomarenko

Maria Ponomarenko

University of MInnesota School of Law

Date Written: February 6, 2019

Abstract

For more than 60 years, prominent policing scholars have argued that the way to address the many problems of policing is to treat police departments like all other agencies of government -- and to require that they set policy through something like notice and comment rulemaking. This paper argues that despite its intuitive appeal, rulemaking is not a particularly apt solution to policing's various ills. Although policing scholars have been right to look to administrative law for ideas on how to govern policing, they have been focused on the wrong set of administrative tools. Instead of looking to the public to regulate the police through rulemaking, a more promising alternative is to create what I call regulatory intermediaries -- permanent administrative bodies that can stand in for the public and help regulate the police.

Keywords: Policing, Rulemaking, Administrative Law, Law Enforcement, Democratic Policing

Suggested Citation

Ponomarenko, Maria, Rethinking Police Rulemaking (February 6, 2019). Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333804 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333804

Maria Ponomarenko (Contact Author)

University of MInnesota School of Law ( email )

229 19th Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
346
rank
347,963
PlumX Metrics