Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and the Second Monster

25 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2019

See all articles by Eric L. Muller

Eric L. Muller

University of North Carolina School of Law

Date Written: February 16, 2019

Abstract

In June of 2018 the Supreme Court repudiated its notorious 1944 decision in Korematsu v. United States upholding the mass removal of Japanese Americans from the West Coast. While some celebrated its demise and others doubted the Court’s sincerity, nobody paid attention to an equally odious decision that has hidden behind Korematsu: Hirabayashi v. United States. In that 1943 decision the Court unanimously upheld a lesser racial restriction on Japanese Americans, a dusk-to-dawn curfew. Like Korematsu, that decision has never been overruled, but unlike Korematsu, it has never been deeply scrutinized or pervasively condemned. Hirabayashi survives, providing potential cover for all manner of racial rules less burdensome than removal, such as surveillance, identity cards, or house arrest. This essay flushes Hirabayashi from the shadows, revealing it to be just as flawed as Korematsu, considerably more dangerous, and equally deserving of repudiation.

Suggested Citation

Muller, Eric L., Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and the Second Monster (February 16, 2019). Texas Law Review, Forthcoming, UNC Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3335926

Eric L. Muller (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-7067 (Phone)
919-962-1277 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
598
rank
323,197
PlumX Metrics