The Truth Limps After: Social Science and Advocacy in Chicago Gun Sentencing

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, Forthcoming

75 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2019 Last revised: 26 Jan 2020

Date Written: February 17, 2019

Abstract

At a pivotal moment in a 2013 Chicago debate on criminal sentences for illegal gun-carrying, social scientists from the University of Chicago Crime Lab advocated for sentence enhancements, aligning with Mayor Rahm Emanuel's policy goals. These scientists argued that sentence enhancements were guaranteed to benefit public safety despite a lack of research upholding the efficacy of sentence enhancements. This paper argues that the Crime Lab wrongly took "incapacitative" crime reduction for granted; presents an original analysis of Chicago neighborhood-level data testing the connection between criminal sentences for gun-carrying and violent crime rates, which fails to demonstrate a connection between higher gun sentences and lower violent crime; and argues that the Crime Lab's advocacy was not - and could not have been - "neutral" in the way the organization claimed.

Suggested Citation

Hilke, Wally, The Truth Limps After: Social Science and Advocacy in Chicago Gun Sentencing (February 17, 2019). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3336306 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3336306

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
772
Rank
527,705
PlumX Metrics