Exclusionary Conduct in Data-Driven Markets: Limitations of Data Sharing Remedy

Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, jnz036, Doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnz036

Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 19-04

41 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2019 Last revised: 16 Jan 2020

See all articles by Vikas Kathuria

Vikas Kathuria

School of Law, BML Munjal University

Jure Globocnik

Max Planck Law Network - Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

Date Written: February 18, 2019

Abstract

The natural consequence of finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU is to offset the harm to consumer welfare by restoring competition through effective remedies. As big data constitutes the most vital resource in data-driven markets, a dominant undertaking can exclude its rivals from accessing user data and thus deprive them of scale in markets that are characterised by network effects. Indeed, the European Commission found Google guilty of excluding its rivals in the Android licensing case by adopting this strategy. It is, however, unclear as to which remedy can most efficiently restore competition in such cases. This paper analyses the viability of mandatory data sharing as a remedy to restore competition in the affected market. The paper approaches this research question from both theoretical and practical standpoints. First, it analyses the viability of mandatory data sharing remedy from legal, economic and, technological perspective, followed by an assessment of such a remedy within the framework of the GDPR. Based on this comprehensive investigation, it concludes that mandatory data sharing is not the optimal solution to remedy loss to consumer welfare. In view of this, reliance can be placed on other behavioural and structural remedies.

Keywords: Exclusionary conduct, big data, remedies, Google, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

JEL Classification: K21, L12, K42

Suggested Citation

Kathuria, Vikas and Globocnik, Jure, Exclusionary Conduct in Data-Driven Markets: Limitations of Data Sharing Remedy (February 18, 2019). Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, jnz036, Doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnz036, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 19-04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3337524

Vikas Kathuria (Contact Author)

School of Law, BML Munjal University ( email )

Jure Globocnik

Max Planck Law Network - Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
564
Abstract Views
2,655
Rank
94,795
PlumX Metrics