Clarifying Relative Plausibility: A Rejoinder

18 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2019

Date Written: February 19, 2019

Abstract

This rejoinder replies to twenty commentaries on our article, "Relative Plausibility and Its Critics" (available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3179601.)

Our response has four objectives:

(1) presenting further details regarding relative plausibility and the scope of our project in order to address some of our critics' claims of ambiguity;

(2) examining some important methodological considerations;

(3) clarifying the significance of the conjunction problem and its role in the "probability debates"; and

(4) noting avenues for future research.

Keywords: evidence, proof, epistemology, probability, plausibility, inference to the best explanation

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald Jay and Pardo, Michael S., Clarifying Relative Plausibility: A Rejoinder (February 19, 2019). U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3338080 (2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3338080 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3338080

Ronald Jay Allen

Northwestern University Law School ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Michael S. Pardo (Contact Author)

University of Alabama School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
291
rank
349,631
PlumX Metrics