Reasons For and Against Criminalization: Discussion of the Realm of Criminal Law

Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 16-37, 2018

27 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2019

See all articles by Re'em Segev

Re'em Segev

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 16, 2018

Abstract

Antony Duff claims that a political community has a reason to criminalize all and only actions that are both morally wrong and “public”, namely, violate the values of relevant community. In what follows, I consider several arguments against Duff’s claims. My general objection is that, in the relevant context, all of the elements that Duff considers as morally significant in themselves – the moral status of actions (as wrong or permissible), their “public” (or “non-public”) nature and the (criminal) law itself – are morally significant only if and when they are derived from more basic factors (that are morally significant in themselves). For illustration, I assume in what follows, with respect to the most basic factors, that there are foundational reasons to promote well-being and distributive or retributive justice, for example, that there is a reason to prevent the suffering of a virtuous person (who does not deserve to suffer in this way).

Keywords: Criminal Law; Wrongs

Suggested Citation

Segev, Re'em, Reasons For and Against Criminalization: Discussion of the Realm of Criminal Law (May 16, 2018). Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 16-37, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3342748

Re'em Segev (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, 91905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://en.law.huji.ac.il/people/reem-segev

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
124
PlumX Metrics