Against a Uniform Definition of Maritime Piracy

Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal, 3: 1-20, 2016

20 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2019

See all articles by M. Bob Kao

M. Bob Kao

Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Commercial Law Studies

Date Written: December 1, 2016

Abstract

Many scholars argue that a major obstacle to eradicating the global problem of maritime piracy is the lack of a uniform definition of piracy. Their chief concern is that without a uniform definition, it is difficult to formulate responses on a systemic and global level. This article contends that having multiple definitions of piracy for different purposes is conducive to combating piracy and addressing the ensuing legal issues. While uniformity between certain definitions should be pursued, complete uniformity should not be adopted due to the multiple purposes the definition of piracy serves. This article categorises the definition of maritime piracy according to four respective purposes: public international law, domestic criminal law, commercial law, and piracy prevention. It demonstrates that uniformity is important between the first two purposes due to the need to uphold rule of law principles. However, this definition should not be uniform with regard to the definitions for the last two purposes due to the need for flexible and expansive definitions in commercial law and piracy prevention.

Keywords: counter-piracy operations, criminal law, international law of the sea, piracy, UNCLOS

Suggested Citation

Kao, M. Bob, Against a Uniform Definition of Maritime Piracy (December 1, 2016). Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal, 3: 1-20, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344053

M. Bob Kao (Contact Author)

Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Commercial Law Studies ( email )

67-69 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
183
Abstract Views
642
Rank
338,516
PlumX Metrics