The Past and Present Mutual Fund Fee Litigation Under 36(b)

A version of this essay appears in the Elgar Research Handbook on the Regulation of Mutual Funds (2018, William A. Birdthistle and John Morley, eds.).

29 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2019

See all articles by Quinn Curtis

Quinn Curtis

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: October 26, 2017

Abstract

Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act permits mutual fund investors to sue funds for charging excessive asset management fees. This liability for excessive fees has proven to be one of the more problematic areas of mutual fund regulation. Fund complexes view the suits largely as unpredictable nuisances unrelated to fee levels, while for those concerned about mutual fund fees, section 36(b) has never resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs. The extremely fact-bound nature of the excessive fee standard as articulated in the seminal Gartenberg and Jones cases makes obtaining early dismissal of suits difficult and litigation lengthy and expensive. Settlements are common. There is little evidence that suits are effective in bringing fees down in sued funds or that such suits target particularly expensive funds. The goal of this chapter is to situate new developments in mutual fund fee litigation in the larger context of the history and development of the section.

Keywords: Mutual Funds, Fee Litigation, 36(b)

Suggested Citation

Curtis, Quinn, The Past and Present Mutual Fund Fee Litigation Under 36(b) (October 26, 2017). A version of this essay appears in the Elgar Research Handbook on the Regulation of Mutual Funds (2018, William A. Birdthistle and John Morley, eds.). , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344494

Quinn Curtis (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/qc3q/2298852

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
196
Abstract Views
749
rank
192,262
PlumX Metrics