Recording as Heckling

57 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2019

Date Written: February 28, 2019

Abstract

A growing body of authority recognizes that citizen recording of police officers and public space is protected by the First Amendment. But the judicial and scholarly momentum behind the emerging “right to record” fails to fully incorporate recording’s cost to another important right that also furthers First Amendment principles: the right to privacy.

This Article helps fill that gap by comprehensively analyzing the First Amendment interests of both the right to record and the right to privacy in public, while highlighting the role of technology in altering the First Amendment landscape. Recording information can be critical to future speech and, as a form of confrontation to authority, is also a direct method of expression. Likewise, efforts to maintain privacy while navigating public space may create an incubator for thought and future speech, and also serve as direct expressive resistance to surveillance regimes.

As this Article explains, once the First Amendment values of both the right to privacy and the right to record are systematically understood, existing doctrine—including the concept of the “heckler’s veto”—can help restore balance between these sometimes competing forms of “speech,” permitting citizen recording of police as well as allowing government regulation of certain recordings that breach the privacy shields of other citizens.

Just as a heckler’s suppression of another’s free speech justifies government regulation of the heckler’s speech, so too when recording (a form of speech) infringes on and pierces reasonable efforts to maintain privacy (also a form of expression), then the government may limit the ability to record. The heckling framework underscores that liberated and vibrant public space is contingent on a balance between the ability to gather information and maintain privacy in public, while also providing a doctrinally-grounded path for adjudicating those interests.

Keywords: privacy, first amendment, right to record, technology, police, surveillance, sousveillance, freedom of expression

JEL Classification: k1, k13, k14, k19, k3, k30, k39, k49

Suggested Citation

Skinner-Thompson, Scott, Recording as Heckling (February 28, 2019). Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 108 (2019); U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19-6. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344815

Scott Skinner-Thompson (Contact Author)

University of Colorado Law School ( email )

401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
(303) 735-5294 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=818

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
697
rank
280,003
PlumX Metrics