Requiring a Single IRB for Cooperative Research in the Revised Common Rule: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the UK and Elsewhere?

39 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2019

See all articles by Edward Dove

Edward Dove

University of Edinburgh - School of Law

Date Written: March 7, 2019

Abstract

One of the most significant revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (known as the “Common Rule”), from an organizational ethics and governance perspective, is the mandated transition towards a single institutional review board (sIRB) system that eschews IRB review at multiple research sites. The sIRB rule is controversial for several reasons. Nevertheless, in this article, I argue in support of the mandated transition towards an sIRB system. I argue that this reform that this is part of a wider principles-based regulatory objective of the revised Common Rule, which itself is part of an emerging international movement in health research regulation. This movement advocates both research participant protection and ethical research promotion. Notwithstanding my general support for the sIRB rule, I draw on my own recent empirical research to highlight several residual weaknesses in the US regulatory structure for research ethics review, and suggest ways in which these weaknesses might be addressed in future regulatory reforms to improve upon the sIRB rule.

Keywords: Common Rule, ethics committees, institutional review boards, law, regulation, research ethics committees

Suggested Citation

Dove, Edward, Requiring a Single IRB for Cooperative Research in the Revised Common Rule: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the UK and Elsewhere? (March 7, 2019). Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2019/05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3348347 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3348347

Edward Dove (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh - School of Law ( email )

Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
192
PlumX Metrics