Infusing Reconciliation into the Sentencing Process

(2019) 28:2 Constitutional Forum 25

6 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2019 Last revised: 28 Mar 2019

See all articles by Colton Fehr

Colton Fehr

University of Alberta - University of Alberta, Faculty of Law, Students

Date Written: March 8, 2019

Abstract

The Canadian criminal justice system has long been criticized for its over-incarceration of First Nations peoples. In response, Parliament required that courts consider the unique circumstances impacting First Nations persons before passing sentence, and in particular before imposing a sentence of imprisonment. Although these efforts are important for reconciling relations between First Nations people and Canada, scholars have paid inadequate attention to whether the process in which the vast majority of sentencing hearings are conducted might also hinder reconciliation. In this article, I contend that the traditional order of sentencing submissions will generally fail to facilitate important dialogue between state representatives and First Nations people. I propose that reversing the order in which counsel make sentencing submissions would allow for a dialogical approach to sentencing that would better ensure that First Nations offenders feel they are treated fairly by the criminal justice system.

Keywords: Criminal Law; Aboriginal Law

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Fehr, Colton, Infusing Reconciliation into the Sentencing Process (March 8, 2019). (2019) 28:2 Constitutional Forum 25. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3349386

Colton Fehr (Contact Author)

University of Alberta - University of Alberta, Faculty of Law, Students ( email )

111 89 Ave NW
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
61
PlumX Metrics