'Intolerant and Illiberal'? Trinity Western University and its Implications for Charter Jurisprudence

(2019) 89 Supreme Court Law Review (2d)

Posted: 3 Apr 2019

See all articles by Derek Ross

Derek Ross

Christian Legal Fellowship

Date Written: February 1, 2019

Abstract

Canada’s Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. This means that religious communities have the right to “insist upon certain moral commitments from those who wish to join” them. In Wall v Highwood Congregation, the Supreme Court affirmed that “religious groups are free to determine their own membership and rules” and that it will not intervene in “issues of theology.” But two weeks later, in Trinity Western University, the Supreme Court ruled that government actors could refuse to recognize law degrees issued by a religious university because of its religiously-based admissions requirements.

Many aspects of the Trinity Western ruling are difficult to reconcile with the Court’s previous interpretations of the Charter, including its 2001 decision which explicitly affirmed Trinity Western’s right to maintain a Community Covenant. This article offers a critique of the reasoning employed (especially by the majority), and provides some reflections on what the ruling might mean for future jurisprudence, particularly in the area of religious freedom.

Suggested Citation

Ross, Derek, 'Intolerant and Illiberal'? Trinity Western University and its Implications for Charter Jurisprudence (February 1, 2019). (2019) 89 Supreme Court Law Review (2d). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3351364

Derek Ross (Contact Author)

Christian Legal Fellowship ( email )

285 King Street
London, Ontario N6B 3M6
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
198
PlumX Metrics