Geoeconomic Disruption: A Comment on the Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses

Notes for the Workshop on “The Shape of Geoeconomics to Come” Cato Institute, Washington DC, 26 March 2019

11 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2019 Last revised: 21 Aug 2019

See all articles by Dan Ciuriak

Dan Ciuriak

Ciuriak Consulting Inc.; Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI); C.D. Howe Institute; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada; BKP Development Research & Consulting GmbH; Balsillie School of International Affairs

Date Written: March 14, 2019

Abstract

The global economy is being reshaped through the overt use of economic power. This marks a point of rupture with the geoeconomic framework of the postwar period, which was largely built on the legalistic rules-based system that grew up under and around the GATT/WTO. In this essay, I interpret the developments through two inter-related lenses: trade and technology. I argue that geoeconomics is endogenous to the underlying economic conditions of the day. In the present instance, the driving force of change is the emergence of a new form of economy based on big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which creates powerful incentives for strategic trade and investment policy to capture the vast benefits at stake. This disrupts a geoeconomic order whose creation was predicated on the win-win benefits of trade in an era dominated by industrial production. To shed light on the evolution of the conflict between China and the United States, the principal antagonists in the trade conflict to date, in terms of how power is being applied and with what consequences, I discuss the metrics of economic power. I identify four key metrics; the present episode of geoeconomic conflict features capabilities in all four areas being deployed based on the economic power assets of the conflicted economic powers. Finally, I discuss the implications of this outbreak of conflict for the geoeconomic order going forward in light of economic history, which suggests that geoeconomics is episodic in nature, that episodes feature often radically different behaviours from predecessors and successors, and that the characteristic institutions of each episode are creatures of their age. This prepares us for pervasive institutional change as the transition in geoeconomic orders unfolds.

Keywords: geoeconomics, data-driven economy, great power rivalry, economic power, WTO reform, China's rise

JEL Classification: F13, F15, F51, F55, K21, K24

Suggested Citation

Ciuriak, Dan, Geoeconomic Disruption: A Comment on the Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses (March 14, 2019). Notes for the Workshop on “The Shape of Geoeconomics to Come” Cato Institute, Washington DC, 26 March 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3352813 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3352813

Dan Ciuriak (Contact Author)

Ciuriak Consulting Inc. ( email )

83 Stewart St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6H9
Canada

Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) ( email )

57 Erb Street West
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2
Canada

C.D. Howe Institute ( email )

67 Yonge St., Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario M5E 1J8
Canada

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada ( email )

Canada

HOME PAGE: http://ciuriakconsulting.com/

BKP Development Research & Consulting GmbH ( email )

Romanstrasse 74
München, 80639
Germany

Balsillie School of International Affairs ( email )

67 Erb Street West
Waterloo, ON N2L 6C2
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
195
Abstract Views
1,343
Rank
320,287
PlumX Metrics