New Metrics and the Politics of Judicial Selection

28 Pages Posted: 15 Apr 2019

See all articles by Jeremy Kidd

Jeremy Kidd

Mercer University - Walter F. George School of Law

Date Written: March 19, 2019

Abstract

Recent Supreme Court nomination hearings have become increasingly rancorous, revealing the in-creasing political importance of the judiciary in our system of government. We need to know more about those who are chosen to wield this power, but those being considered have strong incentives to obscure all but the most basic characteristics of integrity, decorum, intellect, and courtesy. One of the most important decisions in our democracy is therefore made with far less information than would be ideal. Only through development of new metrics and refinement of existing metrics can we begin to cut through obfuscation and identify the goals and methodologies of potential judges and justices. Multiple new metrics are discussed, particularly as they pertain to the confirmations of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, as an example of what can be achieved if the importance of metrics in this area is recognized.

Suggested Citation

Kidd, Jeremy, New Metrics and the Politics of Judicial Selection (March 19, 2019). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3355910

Jeremy Kidd (Contact Author)

Mercer University - Walter F. George School of Law ( email )

1021 Georgia Ave
Macon, GA 31207-0001
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
8
Abstract Views
103
PlumX Metrics