Brief of the R Street Institute as Amicus Curiae: Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

33 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2019

See all articles by Charles Duan

Charles Duan

American University Washington College of Law

Date Written: January 16, 2019

Abstract

In Return Mail v. U.S. Postal Service, the Supreme Court will consider whether the United States government is a "person" qualified to petition for post-issuance review of a patent before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, under the provisions of the America Invents Act. This brief makes two primary arguments in support of treating the government as a person.

First, treating the government as a person best effectuates the intent of Congress as expressed in the America Invents Act. Congress created the post-issuance review proceedings to combat the well-known problem of erroneously granted patents, and intended to permit as many interested parties as possible to take advantage of those proceedings, thereby promoting a public good of correctness in existing patent grants. Since the government's petitioning for review of a patent grant brings about that public good no less than any other private entity's petitioning for the same, it follows that permitting the government to file such petitions is consistent with the intent of Congress.

Second, permitting the government to initiate post-issuance review serves important interests of good governance. As the patent-owner petitioner argues, the government does have an alternative avenue for having a patent cancelled: persuading or ordering the director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to initiate a sua sponte reexamination. But between that procedure and having the government petition for post-issuance review under the AIA, the latter is superior insofar as it provides greater transparency into the government's arguments, it offers stronger due process to patent owners whose patents are challenged, and it implements separation of administrative functions to a clearer degree.

Keywords: patents, AIA, inter partes review, administrative law, separation of functions

JEL Classification: O30, O38, H11

Suggested Citation

Duan, Charles, Brief of the R Street Institute as Amicus Curiae: Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (January 16, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3359073 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3359073

Charles Duan (Contact Author)

American University Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Ave NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
364
PlumX Metrics