Analyzing Vertical Mergers to Avoid False Negatives: Three Recent Case Studies

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2151 (2019)

32 Pages Posted: 7 May 2019

See all articles by Steven C. Salop

Steven C. Salop

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: April 5, 2019

Abstract

This article analyzes three recent vertical mergers: a private antitrust case attacking the consummated merger of Jeld-Wen and Craftmaster Manufacturing Inc. (“CMI”) that was cleared by the DOJ in 2012 but subsequently litigated and won by the plaintiff, Steves & Sons in 2018; and two recent vertical merger matters investigated and cleared (with limited remedies) by 3-2 votes by the Federal Trade Commission in early 2019 -- Staples/Essendant and Fresenius/NxStage. There are some factual parallels among these three matters that make it interesting to analyze them together. First, the DOJ’s decision to clear Jeld-Wen/CMI merger appears to be a clear false negative, and the two dissenting Commissioner suggest that the recent FTC decisions similarly are false negatives. Second, the DOJ and possibly the FTC in Staples/Essendant may have overlooked the “Frankenstein Monster” scenario of input foreclosure. Third, both the DOJ and the FTC in Fresenius/NxStage also apparently relied on the absence of complaints in making their clearance decisions. The analysis of these mergers also suggests several policy implications involving the need to analyze the full range of anticompetitive concerns, the potential for merger retrospectives by independent (as opposed to staff) researchers, the height of the evidentiary burden on the agencies to show competitive harm in light of their limited budgets, and the need for greater transparency in Commission statements, as well as the potential errors in relying on a lack of complaints.

Keywords: vertical merger, antitrust, antitrust law, competition, antitrust enforcement, federal trade commission, FTC

Suggested Citation

Salop, Steven C., Analyzing Vertical Mergers to Avoid False Negatives: Three Recent Case Studies (April 5, 2019). Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 2151 (2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3360420 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360420

Steven C. Salop (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9095 (Phone)
202-662-9497 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
6
Abstract Views
89
PlumX Metrics