The Worst of Both Worlds? Dual-Registered Investment Advisers

68 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2019 Last revised: 1 Dec 2019

See all articles by Nicole M. Boyson

Nicole M. Boyson

Northeastern University - D’Amore-McKim School of Business

Date Written: December 1, 2019

Abstract

As fiduciaries, Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) must place client interests ahead of their own. Many fiduciaries are dual-registered as brokers (DRs) and have potential conflicts of interest including revenue sharing from mutual funds, receiving asset-based fees and transaction-based commissions on the same security, and preferential treatment of affiliated mutual funds. Regulators frequently discipline DRs for these conflicts. DRs charge their retail RIA clients higher fees than their brokerage clients or clients of independent RIAs. Finally, DRs prefer institutional share classes of the same underperforming mutual funds they offer brokerage clients. Many DRs appear to fall short of the fiduciary standard.

Keywords: conflicts of interest, registered investment advisers, brokers, dual registration, mutual funds

Suggested Citation

Boyson, Nicole M., The Worst of Both Worlds? Dual-Registered Investment Advisers (December 1, 2019). Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper No. 3360537. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360537

Nicole M. Boyson (Contact Author)

Northeastern University - D’Amore-McKim School of Business ( email )

360 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
617-373-4775 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
920
Abstract Views
3,869
rank
29,170
PlumX Metrics