Wiping Away the Tiers of Judicial Scrutiny

49 Pages Posted: 11 Apr 2019 Last revised: 16 May 2019

See all articles by R. George Wright

R. George Wright

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Date Written: March 26, 2019

Abstract

Throughout much of constitutional law and beyond, courts often decide cases by applying some form of tiered or multi-level judicial scrutiny. The prominence of tiered scrutiny conceals, however, a number of important problems. The undue complications, manipulability, commonly mistaken emphases, and other costs of tiered scrutiny are by now conspicuous and remarkable. Tiered scrutiny review has by now decayed to the point at which its use is no longer justifiable. Among other basic problems, tiered scrutiny now offers only the appearance, but not the reality, of reasonable efficiency and of appropriate constraint on judicial subjectivity and discretion. The practice of tiered scrutiny today clearly undermines several basic rule of law principles. This Article suggests that a simpler, more rule of law-friendly substitute for tiered scrutiny is realistically available, and that such a substitute can also encourage more pragmatically effective law-making.

Keywords: judicial scrutiny, levels of scrutiny, tiers of scrutiny, constitutional scrutiny, fundamental rights, narrow tailoring, government interests

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Wright, R. George, Wiping Away the Tiers of Judicial Scrutiny (March 26, 2019). St. John's Law Review, Forthcoming; Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2019-2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3360541

R. George Wright (Contact Author)

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )

530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
272
PlumX Metrics