A Two-sided Incentive Program for Coordinating the Influenza Vaccine Supply Chain

42 Pages Posted: 3 May 2019 Last revised: 17 Jun 2020

See all articles by Kenan Arifoglu

Kenan Arifoglu

UCL School of Management, University College London

Christopher S. Tang

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Decisions, Operations, and Technology Management (DOTM) Area

Date Written: June 17, 2020

Abstract

Problem definition: The US influenza (flu) vaccine supply chain is decentralized and experiences frequent supply and demand mismatches caused by two key factors:

(1) the vaccine production process (yield) is highly uncertain; and

(2) individuals are self-interested and do not completely take into account positive and negative externalities that they impose on others.

To improve matching of supply and demand, we counteract these factors by developing an ex-ante budget-neutral incentive program.

Methodology: We model the flu vaccine supply chain as a decentralized system consisting of self-interested individuals on the demand side, and a profit-maximizing manufacturer with uncertain yield on the supply side. We use backward induction to characterize the subgame-perfect equilibrium of the sequential game that models the interactions between individuals and the manufacturer.

Results: We develop a two-sided incentive program that proposes ‘vaccination incentives’ to be given to individuals on the demand side, and ‘a menu of transfer payments’ between the social planner and manufacturer on the supply side. When the realized vaccine supply is high (or low), our incentive program provides positive (negative) vaccination incentives for individuals to stimulate (or curb) the demand and eliminate positive (or negative) externalities by making vaccination more affordable (or costly). When social benefits from vaccination are significantly high, our incentive program uses a menu of transfer payments to penalize (or subsidize) the manufacturer for low (or high) yield realizations so that it produces the socially-optimal quantity. We show that our incentive program can attain the social optimum, maintain an ex-ante balanced budget (i.e., budget-neutral in expectation), and distribute the maximum social welfare between individuals and the manufacturer arbitrarily.

Academic/practical relevance: We establish the sources of inefficiency in the flu vaccine supply chain. To eliminate the inefficiency, we develop a two-sided incentive program that policymakers can implement to finance vaccines under an ex-ante balanced budget.

Managerial implications: Vaccination incentives to individuals can ensure their access to the vaccine, but they are not enough to entice the manufacturer to ensure vaccine availability. A menu of contracts contingent on realized yield provides necessary incentives to the manufacturer and assures the availability.

Keywords: Influenza vaccine, outcome-based contract, vaccination incentive, self-interested behavior, externality, random yield

JEL Classification: D11, D21, D61, D62, D81, D86, H23, H41, H51, L12

Suggested Citation

Arifoglu, Kenan and Tang, Christopher S., A Two-sided Incentive Program for Coordinating the Influenza Vaccine Supply Chain (June 17, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3361140 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3361140

Kenan Arifoglu (Contact Author)

UCL School of Management, University College London ( email )

Level 38
One Canada Square
London, England E14 5AB
United Kingdom

Christopher S. Tang

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Decisions, Operations, and Technology Management (DOTM) Area ( email )

110 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/x980.xml

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
297
Abstract Views
2,510
Rank
209,171
PlumX Metrics