Inefficient Water Pricing and Incentives for Conservation

70 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2019

See all articles by Ujjayant Chakravorty

Ujjayant Chakravorty

Tufts University

Manzoor Dar

Independent

Kyle Emerick

University of California, Berkeley

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2019

Abstract

We use two randomized controlled trials in Bangladesh to study a simple water conservation technology for rice production called “Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD)”. Despite proven results in agronomic trials, our first experiment shows that AWD only saves water and increases profits in villages where farmers pay a marginal price for water, but not when they pay fixed seasonal charges. The second RCT randomly distributed debit cards that can be used to pay volumetric prices for irrigation water. This low-cost, scalable intervention causes farmers to place more value on the water-saving technology. Demand for the technology becomes less price-sensitive.

Suggested Citation

Chakravorty, Ujjayant and Dar, Manzoor and Emerick, Kyle, Inefficient Water Pricing and Incentives for Conservation (2019). CESifo Working Paper No. 7560, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3361362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3361362

Ujjayant Chakravorty (Contact Author)

Tufts University ( email )

Medford, MA 02155
United States

Manzoor Dar

Independent ( email )

Kyle Emerick

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Abstract Views
1,727
Rank
408,735
PlumX Metrics