Back to the Future: The Revival of Pennoyer in Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine and the Demise of International Shoe

34 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2019 Last revised: 12 Apr 2019

See all articles by Robert M. Bloom

Robert M. Bloom

Boston College Law School

Janine A. Hanrahan

Boston College, Law School, Student

Date Written: March 29, 2019

Abstract

Answering the personal jurisdiction question—that is, whether a court has power over a party—has required an ever-evolving analysis since the United States Supreme Court’s 1878 holding in Pennoyer v. Neff that a state’s exercise of jurisdiction must be consistent with due process. Under Pennoyer, the due process analysis centered on the state’s power over people and property, as well as its ability to regulate the status of people and entities operating within its borders. In 1945, in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, the Supreme Court articulated a new standard: due process is satisfied so long as a defendant has “certain minimum contacts” with the state such that the suit “does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’”

This Article argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decisions have effectively revived Pennoyer’s focus on physical presence and status, at the expense of the fairness and contact considerations set forth in International Shoe, as the bases for asserting personal jurisdiction. Part I details the jurisdictional analysis under both Pennoyer and International Shoe. Part II discusses the evolution of personal jurisdiction doctrine under International Shoe. Part III demonstrates that the Court’s recent decisions have revitalized Pennoyer’s territorially based regime, and consequently diminished the thrust of International Shoe.

Suggested Citation

Bloom, Robert M. and Hanrahan, Janine, Back to the Future: The Revival of Pennoyer in Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine and the Demise of International Shoe (March 29, 2019). San Diego Law Review, Forthcoming; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 501. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3362577

Robert M. Bloom (Contact Author)

Boston College Law School ( email )

885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Janine Hanrahan

Boston College, Law School, Student ( email )

Chestnut Hill, MA
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
60
PlumX Metrics