Eric Watson and the Cullen Group Case

6 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2019

See all articles by Michael Littlewood

Michael Littlewood

University of Auckland - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 1, 2019

Abstract

According to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue, the aim of the tax avoidance scheme in Cullen Group Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2019] NZHC 404 was to reduce the taxpayer company’s liability to tax by $51.5 million. She assessed it to tax on that basis; and Palmer J, in the High Court at Auckland, upheld the assessment. The Commissioner is to be congratulated on her victory, and one hesitates to criticise a litigation strategy that has proved successful. The aim of this brief article, however, is to suggest that the aim of the scheme was actually to reduce the taxpayer’s liability to tax not by $51.5 million but by about $103 million; and that she should have assessed it to tax on that basis. It is perhaps too late for the Commissioner to advance in this case the argument that leads to this conclusion; but the issue is worth addressing because it has arisen in other cases in the past, it will almost certainly arise again in the future, and there is every reason to suppose that significant public revenues are consequently at risk.

Keywords: Tax avoidance, General Anti-Avoidance Rule, New Zealand, Eric Watson, Cullen Group, power of reconstruction

JEL Classification: K34, K40, K42

Suggested Citation

Littlewood, Michael, Eric Watson and the Cullen Group Case (April 1, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3363385 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3363385

Michael Littlewood (Contact Author)

University of Auckland - Faculty of Law ( email )

Private Bag 92019
Auckland Mail Centre
Auckland, 1142
New Zealand

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Abstract Views
390
rank
327,269
PlumX Metrics