Contractual Tax Reform

69 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2019 Last revised: 8 Jul 2020

See all articles by Michael Abramowicz

Michael Abramowicz

George Washington University Law School

Andrew Blair-Stanek

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Date Written: 2020

Abstract

One-size-fits-all taxation fails to accommodate diverse taxpayer circumstances. This Article proposes allowing taxpayers to contract into alternative tax regimes administered by private intermediaries. Participating taxpayers would make payments to the intermediaries pursuant to contract, and the intermediaries would be required to pay to the government at least as much as these taxpayers would have paid the government otherwise. That amount is determined based on the actual tax receipts of a control group, taxpayers who wish to contract with an intermediary but instead are chosen at random to continue under the status quo. These alternative tax regimes might better accommodate taxpayers’ preferences, leaving the taxpayers with greater utility, without reducing government revenue. An intermediary could offer different substantive law, different procedural rules, or both. Taxpayers, for example, might receive lower tax rates in exchange for forgoing deductions that cause the taxpayer to engage in socially wasteful behavior. Advances in artificial intelligence make contractual tax reform feasible.

Suggested Citation

Abramowicz, Michael B. and Blair-Stanek, Andrew, Contractual Tax Reform (2020). 61 William & Mary Law Review 1537 (2020), GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2019-10, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3363806 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3363806

Michael B. Abramowicz (Contact Author)

George Washington University Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States

Andrew Blair-Stanek

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
1,424
Rank
564,022
PlumX Metrics