Policy Uncertainty, Financial Stability, and Stress Testing

47 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2019

See all articles by Paul Kupiec

Paul Kupiec

American Enterprise Institute

Date Written: April 1, 2019


Since the 2009 Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), US regulators have employed a representative bank model as the benchmark of comparison in mandatory stress test exercises. For risk management functions, a bank’s own stress model must be calibrated to reflect the bank’s historical performance. I analyze stress test forecasts produced by individual bank and a representative bank stress test models. Each model is calibrated using different data, but an identical statistical approach similar to the Fed’s 2009 SCAP CLASS model. I compare stress test forecasts to actual institution performance over the first 3 years of the financial crisis. Forecasts from the representative bank model differ dramatically from those produced by bank-specific models and actual outcomes. The results highlight the policy uncertainty inherent in using stress tests, both to set minimum bank capital requirements and to assess the capital adequacy needed to maintain banking system stability.

Keywords: policy uncertainty, stress test, financial stability

JEL Classification: G17, G21, G28

Suggested Citation

Kupiec, Paul, Policy Uncertainty, Financial Stability, and Stress Testing (April 1, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3363866 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3363866

Paul Kupiec (Contact Author)

American Enterprise Institute ( email )

1789 Massachusetts ave NW
Washington DC, DC 20036
United States
2028627167 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics