Research Counts, Not The Journal

12 Pages Posted: 8 May 2019 Last revised: 18 Nov 2019

See all articles by Abambres M

Abambres M

Num3ros; Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências

Tiago Ribeiro

World Bank

Ana Sousa

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Eva Lantsoght

Delft University of Technology - Department of Engineering Structures

Date Written: November 9, 2018

Abstract

‘If there is one thing every bibliometrician agrees, is that you should never use the journal impact factor (JIF) to evaluate research performance for an article or an individual – that is a mortal sin’. Few sentences could define so precisely the uses and misuses of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) better than Anthony van Raan’s. This manuscript presents a critical overview on the international use, by governments and institutions, of the JIF and/or journal indexing information for individual research quality assessment. Interviews given by Nobel Laureates speaking on this matter are partially illustrated in this work. Furthermore, the authors propose complementary and alternative versions of the journal impact factor, respectively named Complementary (CIF) and Timeless (TIF) Impact Factors, aiming to better assess the average quality of a journal – never of a paper or an author. The idea behind impact factors is not useless, it has just been misused.

Keywords: Scientific Papers, Impact Factor, Indexing Databases, Research Quality, Scientific Performance, Scientometrics

Suggested Citation

M, Abambres and Ribeiro, Tiago and Sousa, Ana and Lantsoght, Eva, Research Counts, Not The Journal (November 9, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3368683 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368683

Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências

Portugal

Tiago Ribeiro

World Bank

Ana Sousa

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Eva Lantsoght

Delft University of Technology - Department of Engineering Structures ( email )

Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
841
rank
338,324
PlumX Metrics