AI & IP: Innovation & Creativity in an Age of Accelerated Change

63 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2019 Last revised: 8 Oct 2019

See all articles by Daryl Lim

Daryl Lim

University of Illinois at Chicago John Marshall Law School; Fordham University - Fordham Intellectual Property Institute

Date Written: April 9, 2019

Abstract

From a glimmer in the eye of a Victorian woman ahead of her time, AI has become a cornerstone of innovation that will be the defining technology of our time. Around 2016, the convergence of computing power, funding, data, and open-source platforms tipped us into an AI-driven Fourth Industrial Revolution. AI can make a difference in accelerating disruptive innovation by bringing a data-driven approach to invention and creation. To do so, the law must embrace change and innovation as an imperative in a journey towards an ever-shifting horizon. AI both enables and challenges how we reward individuals whose ingenuity, industry, and determination overcame the frailty of the human condition to offer us inventions that make our lives more efficient and pleasurable. It will take a clear-eyed view to ensure that copyright and patent laws do not impede the very progress they were designed to promote.

In the creative arts, the work for hire doctrine provides a pragmatic legal vehicle for interests to vest and be negotiated by the commercial interests best placed to encourage investment in both the technology and its downstream uses. Like human-generated work, AI-generated work is an amalgam of mimicry mined from our own learning and experience. The training data it draws upon, both for expressive and non-expressive sues, is merely grist for AI’s mill. Consequently, fair use must be applied to prevent holdup by copyright owners and stifle transformative uses enabled by AI. AI can also be used to decipher complex copyright infringement cases such as those involving musical compositions. In the technological arts, the controversy will revolve around who owns innovative breakthroughs primarily or totally attributed to AI. How should these breakthroughs affect the regard for the notion of PHOSITA? How does AI change the equation when it comes to infringement? And how can AI help save the patent system from obsolescence?

Keywords: artificial intelligence, copyright, patent

Suggested Citation

Lim, Daryl, AI & IP: Innovation & Creativity in an Age of Accelerated Change (April 9, 2019). 52 Akron Law Review 813 (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3369200

Daryl Lim (Contact Author)

University of Illinois at Chicago John Marshall Law School ( email )

300 South State Street
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Fordham University - Fordham Intellectual Property Institute ( email )

150 West 62nd Street, Rm 7-145
New York, NY 10023
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
299
Abstract Views
1,657
rank
105,789
PlumX Metrics